Tempo 30 in Dresden: traffic jam instead of security - citizens dissatisfied!

Tempo 30 in Dresden: traffic jam instead of security - citizens dissatisfied!

Dresden, Deutschland - in Dresden is currently all about the topic of speed 30. While the Greens in the city council are pleading for an expansion of the Tempo 30 areas, you will often find yourself in the opposition. A sign that the discussion about speed limits in the city gains momentum. But not all share the enthusiasm for these measures. The city council Steffen Große from Bündnis Germany warns of the possible consequences that could increase the speed 30 zones. He sees the risk that the traffic situation for cars, buses and trains will be further slowed down, especially given the fact that 377 new pace 30 positions have already been set up in the past ten years, which could affect mobility, such as the Saxon reported.

The discussion is fueled by the recent figures in the city traffic situation. According to the mayor Stephan Kühn, Tempo 30 areas serve not only traffic safety, but also to noise protection. Nevertheless, there are views that doubt that the speed limits actually reduce the number of accidents. The number of traffic accidents in Dresden has been constant for years, which the Tag24

rising fine income

A conscious throttling of the speed leads to an increase in the stowage pages in the city. The latest data from TomTom show longer travel times and more traffic jams, a fact that is also favored by the collapse of the Carol Bridge. Despite these challenges, the city remains of the opinion that the travel speed has remained constant since 2018.

Tempo 30: A step to sustainability?

The discussion about speed limits goes beyond the city limits of Dresden. Nationwide it is considered whether these regulations could not even contribute to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The Environmental Bundesamt recommends an introduction of km/h. These measures could not only reduce air pollution emissions, but also reduce noise in cities. Simulations show positive effects on the quality of life in urban areas, which could strengthen urban planners and traffic politicians in their argument.

In the balance between traffic safety and mobility freedom, the city of Dresden seems to be faced with a pioneering decision. The course are set, but the different perspectives and interests have to be taken into account in order to find a solution that does not unnecessarily stress everyday life in the city.