Administrative Court: House ban for police officers in Dresden day care center right!

Administrative Court: House ban for police officers in Dresden day care center right!

A controversial judgment caused excitement in Dresden: The administrative court decided that Christian employers, such as the management of free day care centers, have the right to discriminate their employees according to religious criteria. The decision is less gratifying for many to take a father from the Az Conni children's shop in Dresden Neustadt, who is a police officer with a ban on a house to ensure a police -free space for children. This was explained by the court in a main hearing that took place in the past few weeks and which the house was banned as legal. The judgment also means a cancellation of the children's shop's earlier operating license, which was withdrawn by the State Youth Welfare Office in December 2023 due to an alleged child welfare. The Saxony reported that the main hearing before the administrative court showed that no factual reasons for the withdrawal of the operating license or the closure of the children's store.

The police officer's exclusion is particularly critically regarded by many viewers, since the role of law enforcement officers in society and their contribution to general security should not be neglected. In Saxony, about a quarter of the population are bound denominational, which means that the context of this topic is also complicated. In this special case, the house ban was originally imposed because a slogan like "No Cops, No Nazis" was used on the AZ Conni website, which was interpreted as an equation of police officers with Nazis. These extreme content caused confusion and concerns whether the daycare center is really a suitable place for children. But the judges came to the conclusion that the father cannot be held responsible for the danger he has been responsible for rdl.

child welfare in the focus

whether the exclusion of a parent from a children's shop actually leads to the child's welfare is a passionately discussed topic. The state youth welfare office and the court had different opinions. The father first complained about the situation, which finally led to the investigation. The authority found that the connection between police officers and a potential hazard of the child's welfare cannot be sufficiently proven. The administrative court even goes so far as to say that the rights of the father should not be circumcised due to his profession [the Saxons] (https://www.diesachsen.de/meissen-news/hausverbot-fuer-dresdner-politen-der-verbaglicht-mt-hrt-wärt- 3025002).

The topic of child welfare is generally a sensitive and difficult field. In specialist circles, the effects of extremist attitudes on children are often discussed, such as those growing in a quarterly growing Salafist circles. The question arises as to which measures should be taken in the event of potential dangers and how far government interventions are justified in parental educational rights. According to the article in the [Federal Center for Political Education] (https://www.bpb.de/themen/infodienst/257455/ between REPILIONION FREEITION- and-Moeglicher- Kindenwohllehrdung/), radical beliefs alone do not require any all-encompassing interventions. Each case needs an individual examination to treat child security and parental autonomy in a balanced manner.

This case in AZ Conni is an example of the tension -charged relationship between social beliefs, legal regulations and the upbringing of children. It remains to be seen whether the administrative court's decision is the right shots in this debate. The State Youth Welfare Office had time to appeal to the Bautzen Higher Administrative Court by June 15th. This remains the holistic situation in the children's shop and the debate about the relationship between parent profession and child welfare continues to be tense and uncertain.